A hiring manager and his interview team narrowed a pool of applicants to two
final candidates. One candidate, who is white, had a really
great interview and the
whole interview team agreed that he would be a great fit with
the rest of the team.
He had a bachelor’s degree and five and half years of
relevant experience. The other
candidate, who is black, also had a good interview, a
bachelor’s degree and seven
years of relevant experience and had received numerous
recognition awards from
previous employers for excellent performance. Both candidates
met the minimum
requirements for the job in question, which included a
bachelor’s degree and four
years of related experience.
During a closed-door meeting about the candidates with an
interview team member
and the hiring manager, the hiring manager said that it would
be tough to have
a black person on the team and that he thought a black person
would be hard to
manage. He then said that he would ask the HR department to
make an offer to
the white candidate and proceeded to complete the necessary
paperwork. HR policy
stated that hiring managers must submit all documents
pertaining to the hiring
process to HR for review and retention.
Before extending the offer to the selected candidate, the HR
representative noticed
on the interview notes of the rejected candidate that the
primary reason for not
hiring the candidate was “not a good fit for the team.”
However, the interview
notes in response to each of the interview questions did not
provide anything
specific about why the candidate would not be a good fit for
the team. The HR
representative contacted the hiring manager and interview
team to collect more
detail about the reason for not hiring the candidate who had
more experience than
the selected candidate. The general consensus among the
interview team was that
both candidates were qualified to do the job and both would
have been fine choices.
However, many of them did agree that since the selected
candidate enjoyed playing
golf in his spare time, he would be a good addition to the
team. The interviewer
who heard the hiring manager’s racist remarks about the
rejected candidate informed
the HR representative about the comments. Without documenting
the incident,
the HR representative, who reported to the hiring manager,
phoned the selected
candidate to extend the offer of employment.
Did the organization discriminate against the black candidate?
Is this a potential discrimination case? If so, what could the
HR department have done to mitigate risk in
this case and/or what can they do to mitigate risks of this
nature in the future?
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Writing and Proofreading |
|












Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.